Tillage Technology
Farm History Portal
1930's
- Introduction
- Farm Life
- Accidents & Illnesses
- Building the Lines
- Bringing Electricity
- Changing Farm Work
- Changing Rural Homes
- Chores
- Community Churches
- Crime
- Dancing
- Dating
- Diversity In Religion
- Family Time
- Feeding The Family
- Flour Sack Clothes
- Foodways
- Going To School
- Gypsies
- Having Fun
- Impact of the REA
- Indoor Plumbing
- Jazz
- Migration Out
- Migration In
- Minorities
- Movies
- Prohibition Of Alcohol
- Radio
- School Days
- THE KKK
- School Programs
- Surviving The Weather
- Who Lived In York Co.?
- Machines
- Crops
- Making Money
- Pests
- Water
- World Events
1940's
- Introduction
- Farm Life
- Building Bombs & Planes
- Canteens Greet Gis
- Changes In Eating Habits
- Civil Rights For Minorities
- Conscientious Objectors
- Drive-Ins
- EDUCATION
- Enlistments & The Draft
- Internment In America
- K-12 & Consolidation
- Land Grant Universities
- Local Sports
- Minorities On Base
- More Rights For Women
- Nisei Invade … Nebraska
- Normal Life & War Brides
- Pop Culture At War
- Postwar Food & Fun
- Rationing
- REA Promise Fulfilled
- Rural Bases
- Rural Medicine
- Strains on Rural Housing
- The Blizzard Of ’49
- The GI Bill
- The Home Front
- TV Turns On
- War Ends!
- War Stories
- Fertilizing
- Machines
- A Jeep Is A Jeep, Right?
- Allis Chalmers Tractors
- Case Tractors
- Cultivators
- Fixing Machinery
- Ford-Ferguson Tractors
- Horses Lose Their Jobs
- John Deere Tractors
- Haying Equipment
- Hydraulics
- IH Farmall Tractors
- Planters
- Postwar Technology
- REA In The Field & Barn
- Self-Propelled Combines
- Surplus Everywhere
- Tractor Innovations
- Vise Grip
- Making Money
- Crops
- Water
- Pests
1950's & 1960's
- Introduction
- Crops
- Farm Life
- Harvest Technology
- Machines
- Allis-Chalmers Tractors
- Corn Combines
- Cotton Harvesting
- Ford Tractors
- From Barns To Behlen Buildings
- Harvesting Wheat
- J. I. Case Tractors
- John Deere Tractors
- Massey-Harris becomes Massey-ferguson
- Minimum Tillage Changes Planters & Cultivators
- Other Tractors In The 1950s And 60s
- Tractor Pulling
- Tractors
- Making Money
- Ag Lobbies Washington
- Agribusiness
- Food For Peace
- Farm Families Going To The City
- Farmers Teach Wall Street Futures
- Farming For The Government
- Food Stamps
- IBP & Boxed Beef
- Ike’s Farm Programs
- JFK’s Farm Programs
- Johnson’s Farm Programs
- Sales Day
- Supermarkets Dominate
- The Rise & Fall Of The Omaha Stockyards
- Truman’s Farm Program
- Planter Technology
- The Golden Age Of Pesticides
- World Events
- Water
- Center Pivots Take Over
- Connections Between Surface And Groundwater
- Exporting Water
- First Pivots Installed
- How Pivots Work
- Making Circles Into Squares
- Nebraska’s Unique Natural Resource Districts
- Other Center Pivot Innovators
- Robert Daugherty & Valmont
- State To State Water Agreements
- The 1950s Worldwide Boom In Irrigation
- Valmont’s Center Pivot Patent Runs Out
- Water Wars
1970's - Today
- Farming in the 70s to Today
- Farm Life
- Crops
- Making Money
- Machines
- Partial Bibliography
- Pests & Weeds
- Planter Technology
- Water
- World Events
Today, more than six billion people in the world rely on food grown on just 11 percent of the global land surface. That’s the amount of land that is considered arable, or able to produce crops at all. Even less land – only 3 percent of the Earth’s surface – offers inherently fertile soil. The rest is considered marginal farmland. Some of the most fertile land is in the Midwest of North America, central Mexico, Argentina, Britain, northeastern China and a few pockets in other parts of the globe.
Understandably, when fertile soil is used, when crops are grown on them, the fertility is drawn out. Nutrient levels diminish as plants draw them out. Moisture levels decline. Repeated plowing and cultivating can open it up to erosion from wind and water. In the last quarter of the 20th century, agricultural researchers found new ways to preserve soil fertility by managing the residue left on the field year to year through a variety of reduced tillage or conservation tillage techniques.
Crop Residue Management and Tillage System Definitions
|
||||
Unmanaged
|
Crop Residue Management (CRM)
|
|||
Intensive- or
conventional-till |
Reduced-till
|
Conservation Tillage
|
||
Mulch-till
|
Ridge-till
|
No-till
|
||
Moldboard plow or other intensive tillage used | No use of moldboard plow and intensity of tillage reduced | Full-width tillage, but further decrease in tillage intensity | Only the tops of ridges are tilled | No tillage performed since harvest of previous crop |
< 15% residue cover remaining | 15-30% residue cover remaining |
30% or greater residue cover remaining on soil surface after planting
|
There are a variety of tillage methods available to farmers today. As the table above indicates, farmers using conventional tillage practices will work the ground intensively several times during the growing season. After the harvest is over, conventional farmers will use a moldboard plow to turn most of the residue of last year’s crop back underground, leaving the soil surface exposed over the winter. The farmer may go over the field again before planting and again to mechanically cultivate weeds between row crops several times before harvest.
The different forms of Crop Residue Management (CRM) practices start from an understanding that leaving stalks or straw on the field will protect it from wind and water.
Farmers using reduced tillage practices still go over the whole field with a cultivator after harvest, but they will leave between 15 and 30 percent of the residue on the field.
Mulch till systems simply leave more residue than reduced tillage, usually around 30 percent.
Ridge till systems will leave the residue from harvest undisturbed before planting, except if the farmer needs to inject nutrients. Planting is completed in a seedbed prepared on four- to six-inch high ridges that are formed and rebuilt during row cultivation for weed control. Residue is left on the surface between ridges.
No till systems leave the residue undisturbed from harvest to planting except for fertilizer application. In no-till systems up to 70 percent of the field will be covered with crop residue from last year. Weeds are controlled through pesticide applications.
Statistics from a national survey by the Conservation Technology Information Center show that conservation tillage practices are increasing.
- 40.7 percent of farmers in 2004 were using some form of conservation tillage (either mulch-, ridge-, or no-till). That’s up from 26.1 percent in 1990.
- Another 21.5 percent of farmers in 2004 were using reduced-till systems. That’s down slightly from 25.3 percent in 1990.
- Only 37.7 percent of farmers in 2004 were still using conventional tillage techniques, down from 48.7 percent in 1990.
If we add the figures for reduced- and conservation-tillage practices, fully 62.2 percent of farmers are leaving some residue on their fields. Most of the growth in conservation tillage since 1990 has come from expanded adoption of no-till practices. U.S. cropland planted with no-till more than tripled from 17 million acres (6 percent of total cropland) up to 62 million acres (22 percent) between 1990 and 2004.
Mark Kaliff (left) is part of one of the largest farming operations in central Nebraska and uses ridge-till systems. “It starts at the harvest time, and we try to really get the corn head to do the best job that it can of chewing up those stalks,” Mark says. “And then we come back and we follow those same ridges that allows that tractor to follow that same path to fertilize. So, we’re just fertilizing just the area that the corn plant is going to use. And then we come back and follow that with the planter and trying to stay on those same exact rows each time. It cuts down on compaction.”
Chris Ziegler grew up learning farming from his grandfather Clyde Ehlers, and he’s seen the changes in tillage. “He was a tillage-oriented person,” Chris remembers. “You disc in the fall. You disc in the spring. You fertilizer. You field collate. You plant. Then you cultivate. Then you hill. We went to ridge-till when fuel prices started climbing.”Agronomy professor Don Lee says that the development of GMO Roundup Ready crops have made conservation tillage more feasible by reducing weed pressures. “The farmer could apply this herbicide (Roundup) even when the crop plant was up and growing and kill any weeds that were emerging,” Don says. “As a consequence, minimum tillage farming in states like Nebraska has increased.”
For all of these farmers, changing their tillage system changes all of their other systems as well. Conservation tillage affects machinery, chemical, fuel and labor costs. In general, long-term field trials on a variety of fields show slightly higher yields with no-till systems than intensive tillage, and even higher when no-till is combined with crop rotation systems. Conservation tillage farmers report slightly higher profits, as well.
But the main reason that farmers seem to choose conservation tillage practices involve maintaining a better environment – conservation tillage reduces soil erosion, produces cleaner water runoff, increases water infiltration from the surface to subsoil layers, improves soil moisture, and improves the quality of the soil over the long term.
Written by Bill Ganzel, the Ganzel Group. First published in 2009. A partial bibliography of sources is here.
Start exploring now by clicking on one of these seven sections.
Farm Life / Water / Crops / Making Money / Machines / Pests & Weeds / World Events